This comes mostly down to taste (without any EQ).īest way is to compare headphones next to each other, for a longer period with a variety of music. The other Sennheisers have some slightly different tuning. HD560S and HD600 are the most 'neutral' to me (without EQ) but the HD560S has better low bass but is a bit hotter in the upper mids/lower treble. That EQ would only be accurate on that particular fixture. IMO, you only need to EQ the 'broad' picture and perhaps some large peaks and dips. The HD 660S has a boost in the upper bass, peak in the mids around 1.5 KHz, and a dip in the upper-mids and lower-treble.ĭifferences in pad wear, differences in target response (Harman vs my own below a few hundred Hz) and above 1kHz differences in fixture (pinna-less flatplate vs flatplate with ear canal + pinna acc to a standard). The HD 650 has a boost in the upper bass and a dip in the upper-mids/lower-treble. The HD 600 is even more flat/straight/neutral than even the HD 560S, possibly making them my ultimate choice when this is all over. The HD 599 is a cross between the HD 559 and HD 650. The HD 560S has boosted high-mid and low-treble. Either I'm wrong, or the way those singers were recorded works best with the HD 559. But I want my ears, psychy, and science to match. ![]() ![]() While there are times footsteps and background noises sound bassier than in real life, there is something I like about them when listening to singers such as Andrea Bocelli, Celine Dion, and Enya. The HD 559 have overemphasized upper-bass and lower-mids. I think the headphone reviews at controdict themselves many times. I'm just saying it's helpful when all the measurements are in one place and the reviews are well-written without self-controdiction. I'm not trying to discredit the work of amirm. I think I found measurements for all the Sennheiser headphones I'm interested in.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |